Single core, 32 bit CPU, can’t even do video playback on VLC. But it kinda works for some offline work, like text editing, and even emulation through zsnes! It’s crazy how Linux keeps old hardware like this running.

Thankfully though, this laptop CPU is upgradable, and so is the ram, so I’m planning on revitalizing and bringing this old Itautec to the 21st century 😄

  • wewbull@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    I think my lowest was a 33 MHz 486sx (maybe DX) with 8MB of RAM.

    I wouldn’t want to try it today though.

    • addie@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 days ago

      Yeah, mine was similar. Had some old Win95 machines from work that were getting thrown away; scavenged as much RAM as possible into one case and left Red Hat Linux downloading overnight on the company modem. Needed two boxes of floppy disks for the installer, and I joined up a 60 MB and an 80MB hard drive using LVM to create the installation drive. It was a surprisingly functional machine - much better at networking than it was as a Win95 computer - but yeah, those days are long gone.

    • Grimtuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      I was running my Gateway 2000 486 sx33 with Linux did she extended amount of time as a router with NAT. I’ve still got it somewhere in the loft.

    • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      My first was a rare CPU, but not that old. It was my first PC and was fanless, which I used to think was normal until years later. It was a VIA Cyrix III, maybe 32 MB RAM. Another interesting thing about this CPU was its overclock capabilities. I don’t know how it did survive my overclocking, since I genuinely didn’t have a clue, except that if I raised the numbers, KDE could run, but if I didn’t, well, Xfce was also cool.

      • wewbull@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        Mone might even had been a Cyrix too. Honestly I struggle to remember. My dad bought straight Intels and I bought the clones (cheaper) I can’t remember which one I first started on, but both got it eventually.

  • Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    11 days ago

    Hell yeah! Love seeing old hardware like this still running a modern OS.

    With Linux, if your hardware is a decade old, you’ve barely even reached middle-age.

    Meanwhile Windows 11 won’t even allow an official install on hardware that’s 4-5 years old.

    Long live Linux & FOSS ✊

  • twinnie@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    11 days ago

    I rushed to the comments when I saw a 1.6ghz CPU being called low end but I see OPs already been dealt with. I remember the first ever 1ghz CPU being an overclocked nitrogen cooled AMD Athlon. Me and my mates were all talking about it when it happened.

    • merci3@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      But why would a 1.6 ghz, single core CPU not be low end in 2025? Perfomance itself is very sluggish, and it has only been able to do very simple offline tasks for now. Yeah, yeah, many people used to run 512mb ram and 500mhz cpu setups… But that was in 2000 and whatever.

      • madnificent@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 days ago

        The post title says “ever” rather than “2025”. It’s cool for 2025 and we may get some interesting others, but many here will have ran it on something slower at some point.

        • merci3@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 days ago

          Yes, the title say lowest I ever ran That was the lowest for me, I really don’t get the confusion. And even then, a celeron m 380 was lower end even for it’s own time

    • merci3@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      But why would a 1.6 ghz, single core CPU not be low end in 2025? Perfomance itself is very sluggish, and it has only been able to do very simple offline tasks for now. Yeah, yeah, many people used to run 512mb ram and 500mhz cpu setups… But that was in 2000 and whatever.

  • answersplease77@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    thats my current laptop

    Edit: im exagerating but I really have 20-yr 32-bit Dell laptops running minimal debian linux. and my current laptop is 10+ yrs old Lenovo which I already replaced its screen, rams, keyboard, bluetooth, usb ports… and it’s still working flawlessly for daily tasks, video/music editing, coding and programming, internet browsing :D

  • Eugenia@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 days ago

    Are you using systemd? Because 317 MB of RAM is really low for a normal Debian installation with XFce. At my mom’s 2 GB ram laptop, it uses 850 MB on a cold boot.

    • LeFantome@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 days ago

      It is because it is 32 bit. You can run a 32 bit distro on your machine too if you really want.

      You can get a full Trinity desktop on Q4OS in 130 MB of RAM (32 bit edition).

      • Eugenia@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 days ago

        I don’t think the difference between 32bit and 64bit is 2x in memory sizes, it’s way less than that. I run Q4OS, it runs at 350 MBs here.

        • LeFantome@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 days ago

          Are you running Trinity or KDE?

          Not sure why I get so much less unless it is that. Or are you saying you run Trinity 64 bit?

          I agree that 32 bit is not often going to be 50% less in practice. Sometimes I think we should be running 64 bit kernels with 32 bit userland.

          • Eugenia@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 days ago

            Trinity of course. That’s the point of low end computing with Q4OS. :)

  • rustydrd@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 days ago

    Those are better specs than what I used throughout college (an Asus Eee PC running Debian with Xfce and Openbox). Not a powerful machine, but I absolutely loved that thing.

  • gjoel@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 days ago

    I suspect my first Linux ran on an 80mhz AMD K6. I did however also run it on a retired dual core UltraSPARC some years later I had somehow gotten my hands on. It might have been faster, but at that time it sure felt slow. And it sounded like a train passing through when it was on. In retrospect installing Gentoo on it was an optimistic endeavour.

    • Hule@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      Ackshually… I also had an AMD K5 with Performance Rating 100.

      K6 was 166 MHz and up, Pentium II competitor.

  • Arthur Besse@lemmy.mlM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 days ago

    I’m planning on revitalizing and bringing this old Itautec to the 21st century

    I think it was born in the 21st century? From this it looks like the first Celeron M was in 2004, and the first at that clockspeed was 2005.

    Also, 2GB of RAM is plenty for many purposes - that’s more than any Raspberry Pi before the Pi 4 had!

    • merci3@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 days ago

      Actually… You’re right about the 21st century lmao. I just wanted an excuse to quote Metal Gear Solid

      Also, the issue is not ram itself, of course, 2GB is enough for lots of fun on Linux, it’s the CPU that’s killing me

  • catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 days ago

    If Minix counts, I got it running on a 286 some years ago. I don’t remember how much RAM it had, but it was very little.

  • drathvedro@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 days ago

    I have a 2001 compaq n600 still being used from time to time as a gateway for old tech as it has COM as well as LPT and analog video outs. It has 1.2ghz celeron, 512mb ram, 30 gig drive. Thing is kind of a beast for its time as my own desktop at that time was nowhere close to its spects. Thing was gifted to me after initially being given to install win7 on it. After telling the guy that this isnt going to happen and the best they couldd hope for is winxp and even then it’d struggle, they told me “oh, so linux is the only option then… well, it doesnt work for me. Have it, then, have fun with it!”. I put ubuntu on it, but still gnome ground the poor cpu to a halt, so I had to switch to Xfce. Luckily it turned good enough not to downgrade further to things like bare X or Kolibri OS. Worked as a solitaire machine for my dad for a few years, helped me fix and set up stuff on a few occasions, but nowadays mostly collecting dust in my drawer.

OSZAR »